IMT Supercharged Bookmarks - Help, Issues & Suggestions (thread for IMT SB users)

[Nemanja]

Hi,

the tags you can edit in the submission form are a fine option.

But after the submission, the tag pages of the bookmark sites from your network do not show up the entries which are tagged with this keyword, only alyways a empty page with "Search results for ...." (keyword as tag).

Can you fix this?
The problem is that you are leaving a foot print, because all sites have the same error.

Thanks,

Thanks for notification.
This is known bug issue in many pligg versions.
I will try to find solution to this by myself, but this is not important as you may think,
after all network is working fine with great results in all aspects without this.

About footprints, footprint is like unique thing which can determine and connect things in certain way.
For example online footprint can be adsense pub-id, or blogroll link, or footer link, or some other unique signature.
This pligg bug(no this is not an error) isn't footprint and I will explain you why it isn't.
When you click on the tag, "search.php" script is searching the database for results, using that tag as a search query.
This is same if you would type "something" and click on search.
So in our case script can't find any matches/results and search.php will return empty page,
that doesn't mean that that empty page is a footprint, at least computers/boots/spiders can't recognize that as a footprint,
as a matter of fact no one can say empty search page is a footprint, it is just empty search page for certain terms.

[hans]

Can spin text be nested???

Example:

word word {{a|b}|{c|d}} word word

Output: word word ac word word
Output2: word word bd word word

{{test1|test2} word word word|word word{test3|test4}}

Output: test1 word word word
Output2: word word test 4

If you read few posts back, then you would know that nested syntax is not supported.

nested syntax is supported now, right ? Already try it (using "Check Description / spin Syntax") and it's working fine.

There is also Description inside submit new url: You can also use spin syntax in this format:
{This|Here} is {some|a {little|wee} bit of} {example|sample} text.

I used it (nested syntax) in my description on my newest submit, and just want to make sure that it is ok.

---------- Post added 09-24-2011 at 11:49 AM ----------

Actually it was working before since day 1(nested spin syntax), but recently I was doing some code optimization and testing some bugs, so I didn't want to say that it is working 100% before I'm not sure.
Now I have finished with all the test cases(I hope ) and removed all known bugs so now it is officially supported and working.

It's working then.

[jewelhuq]

I want to know will you star google + button like ? per like 0.01$
It would be a great tools for us

---------- Post added 09-26-2011 at 11:08 AM ----------

Again can you give us page rank 6+ bookmarking submission by this rate?

[Nemanja]

I want to know will you star google + button like ? per like 0.01$
It would be a great tools for us

---------- Post added 09-26-2011 at 11:08 AM ----------

Again can you give us page rank 6+ bookmarking submission by this rate?

Thanks for your inputs.
I'm more into linkbuilding and SEO tools and I don't believe that these kind if services have much impact on any of the IM aspects.

I don't think that I will be focusing my attention on high PR domains/websites in the future either and price can only get higher, after all this is STILL promo period and prices are 50% off.

[Seonetworker]

Hi,

no, the footprint or common thing between them is this: All tags are not function, never mind which site you take from your network.

It is not the same, if someone put a query string that do not match with entries in the database.

A key function of a social bookmark portal is the navigation through the tags and remapping them in a tag cloud.

So why you put the tags in your submission form, if they do not have any function?

Can tags be left empty?

Thanks,

[Nemanja]

Hi,

no, the footprint or common thing between them is this: All tags are not function, never mind which site you take from your network.

It is not the same, if someone put a query string that do not match with entries in the database.

A key function of a social bookmark portal is the navigation through the tags and remapping them in a tag cloud.

So why you put the tags in your submission form, if they do not have any function?

Can tags be left empty?

Thanks,

I understand what you are trying to say here and I understand your point of view, but....

"It is not the same, if someone put a query string that do not match with entries in the database."
It is just the same, especially to the boots/spiders and also to the humans(at least most of them), I explained it above also...
search.php returns empty page for that tag(search query), there are no results for that tag, this is the end of the story,
no matter if you(as a human) can conclude that there are maybe some tags in the database and this might be some bug in the script,
boots can't recognize/conclude that, they just see that there is no results for that query/tag because search/result page is empty.
And as I said it is common issue with many pligg versions, so many pligg based sites on the internet have that exact same empty result page...
Footprint is something unique, empty search/result page isn't, it is common thing to have empty search/result page, so this isn't a footprint and never will be.

"So why you put the tags in your submission form, if they do not have any function?"
They are on every SB page and so you have your relevant keywords there near your title(anchor) and your description.
Also, when this bug will be fixed, tags will be acting as a links to search queries for particular keywords, etc...

"Can tags be left empty?"
No

Because I have explained this 2 times, from now on please just send me PMs if you have more questions about this, thanks.

[fishman]

I am getting a "couldn't resolve host" + url when I am trying to fetch url details.
I just started using a vps host for these particular sites. Maybe it has to do with them?
Anyone have a suggestion?
Thanks

---------- Post added 10-01-2011 at 12:25 AM ----------

Sorry to waste another post but issue was my host not having A records.
Everything fixed.
Great service by the way!

[CashNow]

Hi,

I sent you a message about one of the bookmarks that is returning a 404 error page not found. Could you look into it and correct it. The subsequent rss feeds and pings are also pointing to the 404 page.

Thanks

[Nemanja]

Hi,

I sent you a message about one of the bookmarks that is returning a 404 error page not found. Could you look into it and correct it. The subsequent rss feeds and pings are also pointing to the 404 page.

Thanks

I replied you about 3 hours ago, here it is again:
----------------------------------------------------------
Hi,

First thanks for notifying me and sorry for this issue.
One of the servers was down for few hours for upgrade.
Should all be fine now.

Regards,
Nemanja
----------------------------------------------------------

[CashNow]

Thanks for replying and fixing!!!

---------- Post added 10-07-2011 at 10:27 PM ----------

Hi Nemanja,

I have added my squidoo lens url to supercharged bookmarks and am not seeing any improvement in my lens rank or visitors, but it has only been 2 days! (I know, I know)

So I am wondering if I add the rss feed url and some of the module urls to bookmarks if this would help?

Trying to get this kinda new lens(a couple of months) in the overall top 100. Any other suggestions? It is ranked around 4,300 outta 113,000+.

[Nemanja]

Thanks for replying and fixing!!!

---------- Post added 10-07-2011 at 10:27 PM ----------

Hi Nemanja,

I have added my squidoo lens url to supercharged bookmarks and am not seeing any improvement in my lens rank or visitors, but it has only been 2 days! (I know, I know)

So I am wondering if I add the rss feed url and some of the module urls to bookmarks if this would help?

Trying to get this kinda new lens(a couple of months) in the overall top 100. Any other suggestions? It is ranked around 4,300 outta 113,000+.

No problems always glad to help

hahaha, 2 days I think you need to wait "few" days more.
I'm doing ranking test for few URLs now I have started this test on "2011-09-15",
although I have seen results after first week and now after 3 weeks they are even more improved,
I'm still waiting for few days for all bookmarks to be indexed, so I can present the data of my ranking test.


"So I am wondering if I add the rss feed url and some of the module urls to bookmarks if this would help?"
I must say that I don't understand what that means.

"Trying to get this kinda new lens(a couple of months) in the overall top 100. Any other suggestions? It is ranked around 4,300 outta 113,000+"
I'm also not sure about what we are talking here, if you are referring to squidoo and their internal ranking of the lens,
then I can't help you much, because I don't know and I'm not into their internal ranking system, simply because I'm not interested in squidoo internal lens ranking.

[CashNow]

Hi Nemanja,

Yes when I was asking about adding the rss feed and module urls I was talking about my squidoo page. Squidoo pages have their own rss feeds which looks something like this:

www(dot)squidoo(dot)com/xml/syndicate_lens/----

also each post or section is called a module within the lens. Each module has its own url. So again I was wondering if adding the url for the squidoo rss feed and modules url would help improve not only the squidoo lens ranking but the overall visibility in google (currently not in the 1st 100 pages of google).

As a side note, when I signed in this morning to squidoo I noticed a lens ranking boost of nearly 300 points, so instead of being around 4,300 I am around 4,000.

I am highly interested in getting in the top 100, because in my experience it brings tons of traffic, which of course is a good thing.

Thanks for a great tool and your assistance.

[Nemanja]

Hi Nemanja,

Yes when I was asking about adding the rss feed and module urls I was talking about my squidoo page. Squidoo pages have their own rss feeds which looks something like this:

Squidoo: Why you should read me

also each post or section is called a module within the lens. Each module has its own url. So again I was wondering if adding the url for the squidoo rss feed and modules would help improve not only the squidoo lens ranking but the overall visibility in google (currently not in the 1st 100 pages of google).

Thanks for a great tool and your assistance.

Ahh, OK, I see now,
but sorry I can't be of much help with this, because I didn't tested that kind of things with lens.
I only use lens and other web 2.0 properties to link to my main page I want to rank for, so I just submit those properties and that is it.
Maybe someone else who tried this can give you more info about this tactics and if they will help,
or you can test it by yourself and let as all know the results.
For example wait until this submission process is over + 1-2 weeks, then resubmit lens RSS feeds and few modules (10-20 submission will do the trick) and then check for results.

[CashNow]

Thanks again for the quick reply. Patience is key and I will wait until my campaign is finished, let some time pass and then add module and rss feed urls.

Once I begin another campaign, I will post results.

Thanks again

[CashNow]

Hi Nemanja,

On my second submitted url, the 12th bookmark is returning a 404 error not found.

On my third submitted url, the 3rd bookmark is also returning a 404 error not found.

Could you please look into this and correct.

Also it would be great to include the page rank of the site that the link is being submitted to.

Ran a back link check and I am not seeing the back links, probably the back link checker I am using. Can you suggest a free online back link checking site?

Thanks again for a great tool!

[Nemanja]

Hi Nemanja,

On my second submitted url, the 12th bookmark is returning a 404 error not found.

On my third submitted url, the 3rd bookmark is also returning a 404 error not found.

Could you please look into this and correct.

Also it would be great to include the page rank of the site that the link is being submitted to.

Ran a back link check and I am not seeing the back links, probably the back link checker I am using. Can you suggest a free online back link checking site?

Thanks again for a great tool!

Sorry for inconvenience.
Bookmarks where created, but reports had some trouble with some characters in link like "!" on some servers, now this is permanently fixed for this character.

Google PR will not be included any more.

I have explained many times about 3rd party back link checkers in tool threads....
I can advise you and all others only this, forget about 3rd party checkers.
The only important information you need to know when you are checking back links is this:
are these pages (where your links are located) cached by Search Engine you want to rank at for example google, if they are cached your link is counted by that SE.
You can check that in many ways...

[rugmen]

We have used this service to great effect and it has boosted us to the No`1 on first page for a very sought after keyword in our industry. Althought this took around 6 weeks so not bad at all.

[CashNow]

Sorry for inconvenience.
Bookmarks where created, but reports had some trouble with some characters in link like "!" on some servers, now this is permanently fixed for this character.

Google PR will not be included any more.

I have explained many times about 3rd party back link checkers in tool threads....
I can advise you and all others only this, forget about 3rd party checkers.
The only important information you need to know when you are checking back links is this:
are these pages (where your links are located) cached by Search Engine you want to rank at for example google, if they are cached your link is counted by that SE.
You can check that in many ways...

Thanks for fixing the problem.

Google PR will not be included any more.

Never knew it was included at one time, but not included any more. I think it would be a great feature.

I have explained many times about 3rd party back link checkers in tool threads....
I can advise you and all others only this, forget about 3rd party checkers.

Sorry you are getting repeatedly asked this question, maybe prominently feature this info on the sales page. My instincts are that people are going to keep asking this question (and others) before thinking about searching for an answer.

The only important information you need to know when you are checking back links is this:
are these pages (where your links are located) cached by Search Engine you want to rank at for example google, if they are cached your link is counted by that SE.
You can check that in many ways...

In my case, I do not own the domain name - it is a web 2.0 site. I tried the links: command in google but it returns results that has nothing to do with my site, just similar keywords on that domain. Also tried it as links:"url" but same thing.

So again if you know a better way to do this, it might be useful to include it on the sales page, so we all know the best way to do this.

Thanks

[mraxe]

Just ordered
looking forward for results
Will buy for all my sites if I see improvement in rankings

[CashNow]

Hi Nemanja,

Just wanted to give you a heads up. Was checking 2nd tier bookmarks for url No. 5, which has 3 backlinks to bookmarks and am getting errors for all 3 that reads:

Problem getting latest entries from Finance Feed 2418 - Latest Finance entries , using the following rss feed

http://www.xxx.com/category_rss.php?rss_id=2418

and

MySQL server has gone away

Have not check all 2nd tier backlinks to bookmarks so don't know if this is effecting them all. Does this mean all the backlinks to bookmarks have to be repinged?

Thanks again for working so hard on this, appreciate it