Search:

I´m interested too.

my opinion both, but offpage could filter you out ->pinguin and if not then the on page can do ->panda

don´t know if the examles are so right, I see many domains with keyword in domain int title in metas and mor 4 repaets in body, most got a density of more than 3% and rank top ten for competitive...

seo is still best for traffic, just the rules change from time to time, u must recognize them adjust and go on

thanks for the list

Thanks for the list, quit useful

nice tool, and cheaper than artisteer.

I like the seolytics well

scrapebox is quiet well and my favorite, but look at the result, some pages only mention the keyword once

make a rss feed of all site and post it at the rss submitter

Like Bookmarks some time ago it will be part of the algo, but not the holy grail to solve ranking. just another piece of the big picture

yes, too much a site with different keys always too the same site e.g. start page is too haevy.

the hing, there aren´t much independant search engines left, many use the engine og google and bing so this are the most important. e.g. yahoo = bing, ask=google with a slight difference, then there...

it depends on what it is about, just a informative site don´t need comments, other site it is your personal religion, but dofollow blogs need to check the new comments for spam, so it takes much of...

not too much the early days, grow it slowly or u get a panalty

I think it is affective, but since pinguin the linkporfile should diversificate, not only the keyphrase

I think too, that´s only a mix will achive steady improvments

I think google adwodstool, because of the biggest data basis

It always demands on the keyword and its competition. For longtail yes, for short extrem money keyword no, if the try is for to get enduring serp position, short time top ten with back is possible...

After panda pushed my site a bit further, greed came out and I started to get a backlink package, which got me down after pinguin. No serp up a down and I have to pay for the links, a double waste.