Thread: IMT Supercharged Bookmarks - Boost Your Backlinks-> Rankings-> Sales | Cheap as $0.05 per Bookmark!

Originally Posted by josemateo

So as you recommend in the last paragragh of "Added on 11-14-2011" post we can use the IMT Supercharged Bookmarks tool for every each articles or posts published on our blog, for example, and not for the blog page entirely, meaning the main blog's url, in order to get backlinks for the website and better ranking on Google? Please help me, because I'm confused on this. Thank you.

Like any other link building tool this tool can create backlinks to any URL in order to boost that URL rankings for its keywords.
So you can use this tool for main page/home page or deep pages/posts/categories or whatever.
I wrote that this tool is also for deep pages/posts, because I saw that people are only submitting their home page to the tool.
I have explained this many times before... but once more...
Building links only towards your home page is not natural and can be recognized as such and those backlinks can eventually be devaluated by google, which will then lead to lost rankings, etc...

Nemanja, I just purchased my first set of credits and look foward to using this tool. been reading up on it and the "how to" from seobunny was very helpful. I need to learn more about spinnng though as I have never done any of that before.

Anyway, just wanted to say thanks and looking forward to trying it. Off to research spinning

i like to bookmark my existing backlink can u provide this service or direct me in some direction
thanks

Originally Posted by lockseo

i like to bookmark my existing backlink can u provide this service or direct me in some direction
thanks

I'm directing you to the first post...

Hi, I just submitted my first project with the IMT Supercharged bookmarks, but the maximum you can sign up for (when you click the options button) is 50 bookmarks for $2.50. I thought the offer was for 800 backlinks + pings for $10.00. Did I do something wrong during the submission or signup process?

Originally Posted by RJM2214

Hi, I just submitted my first project with the IMT Supercharged bookmarks, but the maximum you can sign up for (when you click the options button) is 50 bookmarks for $2.50. I thought the offer was for 800 backlinks + pings for $10.00. Did I do something wrong during the submission or signup process?

Yes, you did one thing wrong.
You didn't read the first post/tools description.

is it working for vietnamese site like batdongsan.biz ?

Originally Posted by batdongsan.biz

is it working for vietnamese site like batdongsan.biz ?

Sorry but they are not allowed any more.

Nemanja, I got my first submission done. I know your busy but can you take a look at what I have submitted and let me know how it looks? I just want to make sure I understood the whole spinning thing since I have never done it. I was going to make a thread and post what I used for feedback but that would not be a good idea...

Originally Posted by vf8170

Nemanja, I got my first submission done. I know your busy but can you take a look at what I have submitted and let me know how it looks? I just want to make sure I understood the whole spinning thing since I have never done it. I was going to make a thread and post what I used for feedback but that would not be a good idea...

I have checked and all looks fine

Thanks man

Somedays I'm surprised Google even BOTHERS to index ANY Pligg sites (as well as Scuttle, PHPLD directories, etc.) - Really, they ALL have a footprint that's so utterly obvious - and what DO they contribute to the internet besides 100,000,001 places to dump links?

I suspect 2012 really will be the year that Goog finally and utterly decimates ANY remaining 'value' of linkbuilding to these kind of sites once and for all. Perhaps only the more custom coded and high profile social sites like url.org or multiply or diigo - or one of a kind directory code might make the cut for passing any PR or anchor text weight.

Somedays I'm surprised Google even BOTHERS to index ANY Pligg sites

I have a couple of Pligg sites up. They are some of my busiest sites. Most of the traffic is direct, indicating that the urls have been published in a list or three. The quality of the traffic is low, but the easy metrics for Google to measure look pretty good. Time on site and pages per visit are high and bounce rate is low. Those metrics make the sites look good. About two thirds are from English speaking or EU countries.

Coincidentally the Pligg developer lives about 60mi/100km from me. In a world where he could as easily live 12,500 miles away that is pretty close.

Originally Posted by macgizmoguy

Somedays I'm surprised Google even BOTHERS to index ANY Pligg sites (as well as Scuttle, PHPLD directories, etc.) - Really, they ALL have a footprint that's so utterly obvious - and what DO they contribute to the internet besides 100,000,001 places to dump links?

I suspect 2012 really will be the year that Goog finally and utterly decimates ANY remaining 'value' of linkbuilding to these kind of sites once and for all. Perhaps only the more custom coded and high profile social sites like url.org or multiply or diigo - or one of a kind directory code might make the cut for passing any PR or anchor text weight.

It doesn't matter on which engine site is based on,
that said I don't understand the purpose of this post?

Originally Posted by macgizmoguy

Perhaps only the more custom coded and high profile social sites like url.org or multiply or diigo - or one of a kind directory code might make the cut for passing any PR or anchor text weight.

I don't think Google should or would give a site more value just because they use a custom created script rather than a recycled one like Pligg, PHPD or vBulletin. It's not SEO related. The value of the site should be based on how well the content being submitted to them is moderated.

Originally Posted by AaronLuke

I don't think Google should or would give a site more value just because they use a custom created script rather than a recycled one like Pligg, PHPD or vBulletin. It's not SEO related. The value of the site should be based on how well the content being submitted to them is moderated.

I agree, the platform or script used shouldn't matter as long as the content is indexable by spider.

very exalent

The,
One more thinks can use some pase but i wase even succsse with this tool very much happy cool
Thanks

Quick question. Do social bookmark rates effect how natural your links look to google? I thought someone had said that social bookmarking is ok to do at a faster rate on a newer site than a lot of other methods. What do you think? Great service btw, I just placed a second order.

Originally Posted by yeahthatguy

Quick question. Do social bookmark rates effect how natural your links look to google? I thought someone had said that social bookmarking is ok to do at a faster rate on a newer site than a lot of other methods. What do you think? Great service btw, I just placed a second order.

Every backlink is doing that as a matter of fact(ates effect how natural your links look to google).
Yes, social sites have weight on SERPs, but I think more wight have main social sites that smaller.
I don't think that lots of links will help new site, unless you will get even more backlinks afterwards or your site will became ultra popular,
so I would say slower is better.

Thanks, always a pleasure to hear satisfied customer