Printable View
Which do you prefer ? PPC or CPA ? From which you earn more ?
I think CPA is better in long run. I know AdSense is great and it's the only reason which put PPC on top of CPA but if you loose the AdSense account there aren't many alternative PPC networks you can use. At least none can compare with AdSense. CPA always have lot of good networks and programs so if you loose one you can use another without a problem. Also unlike AdSense are not gonna get your account banned from CPA networks.
CPA is the best can u promotion optimal, money making online can be easy
AdSense used to be a great thing. So PPC used to be the best. You could earn more from less work. But time and things has change. Google focusing more on content and even AdSense prefer original content. There is no AdSense alternative for small site owners.
as you said, for big site owners, there are lot of ways to monetize , but for small website owners, only one !! So we should make our sites more popular, so we'll have more options.
That's if you use PPC. I earn same or more from 1000 UV's from Amazon than AdSense. Affiliate networks pay well too if you do things correctly.
1000 UV a day is not a small amount btw
I'm talking about per month. With small macro sites.Quote:
Originally Posted by rain22
CPA and PPC both at good.
Depends on the type of people you are and what type of work you like to do.
Earnings can be made from both the methods. :)
then its not enough, I thought u are talking about 1000 UV per day.Quote:
Originally Posted by bluearrow
when you have more sites and each has 1000 UV's per day month that means a lot too. I used to do it just with blogger blogs. Used to earn around $50 from each blog which was having around 800-900 UV's per month by using Amazon.Quote:
Originally Posted by rain22
I think with new Google updates, now and in the future, most blogs with less content will go down. So if have lot of blogs, need to care them all !!Quote:
Originally Posted by bluearrow
Maybe because still we have no idea how Panda update will effect long term. Still it's bad only for duplicate content and content farm. Even lets says you can make a post in each blog per week. I think That will be enough. If you make 2 posts per days you can make posts for 14 blogs in a week at least. So still it can get done.
so the best thing is to buy some original articles :D it can save lot of time when someone has more blogsQuote:
Originally Posted by bluearrow
Well yes I think it could be a good investment. But it's pretty hard to find good article writers since many try to sell those crappy spinned article and something those build up using PLRs. Now I write my own stuff. Take time but at least I can be sure all are original.Quote:
Originally Posted by rain22
But make sure someone doesn't scam you..Quote:
Originally Posted by rain22
and knows how to write a article without any error.
I like PPC but I think both have advantages and disadvantages depending on your needs and budget. There is a new marketing concept starting out there. It's called ReadThrough Marketing. Its new but if it catches on it could be very popular, affordable and effective. Keep your eyes on it. Here is a video on you tube and there are write ups about it on CBS MoneyWatch and yahoo news.
www(dot)youtube.com/watch?v=waNaKp2C7Lk
CBS MoneyWatch
finance(dot)bnet.com/bnet/news/read?GUID=18201553
It really depends on what kind of site you have in my opinion. I have had better luck with PPC on some sites and CPA on others. Currently, I am mostly focusing on my PPC sites as I am starting to see some good results and growth.