Welcome to the IMTalk - Internet Marketing & SEO Forum.
  • Login:
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50
  1. #1
    rain22's Avatar
    rain22 is offline IM & SEO Chatty rain22 has a spectacular aura about rain22 has a spectacular aura about
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,601
    Thanks Given
    38
    Thanked 148 Times in 112 Posts

    Best of on-page SEO

    Today I'm going to share with you some best on-page optimization tips. So if you still didn't optimize your site for this, do it now. All steps here are important !!! here we go >

    1- Tittles of the page - most important
    2- search engine friendly URLs with keywords in it
    3- Unique site content
    4- page description
    5- site maps
    6- validate your site's code with the following
    Code:
    http://validator.w3.org/
    http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
    remember that, its better to limit tittles maximum 60 characters and description to 160 characters
    Last edited by rain22; 04-22-2011 at 11:41 AM.

  2. #2
    berkleyhuk is offline IM & SEO Whisperer berkleyhuk is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    India
    Posts
    66
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
    Thanks for your suggestion ....!

    Can you share some own view about keywords stuffing...?

    All comments are welcome here....!

  3. #3
    rain22's Avatar
    rain22 is offline IM & SEO Chatty rain22 has a spectacular aura about rain22 has a spectacular aura about
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,601
    Thanks Given
    38
    Thanked 148 Times in 112 Posts
    keyword density should be about 3%, most of other tags that I didn't mention above are not very useful.

  4. #4
    Alicia is offline IM & SEO Whisperer Alicia is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    29
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rain22 View Post
    1- Tittles of the page - most important
    2- search engine friendly URLs with keywords in it
    3- Unique site content
    4- page description
    5- site maps
    6- validate your site's code with the following
    it's not a bad post for placement but we go with... a slightly different order

    1- Tittles of the page - most important ( this is absolutely indisputable... Yet sometimes people argue with me about it )
    4- page description
    2- URLs with keywords in it ( keywords but I wouldn't worry about being friendly for spiders. for while it was passed around that your code needed to be easy for spiders to read... As if it was in some way difficult for Google to spider the net and by making it easier would make you rank higher. This was ultimately disproven by Matt Cutts... But by that time a lot of people waste a lot of time and money changing off code structures like tables. It is true that pages sometimes load faster using different techniques but as long as it looks good to the user that's all that matters ( which was also reinforced by Matt Cutts ))
    3- Unique site content
    5- Navigation / maps ( a strong site navigation should suffice... It should not be necessary to create a secondary channel for the spiders )
    6- validate your site's code with the following ( if you have the time sure... But we have never seen a site perform any better with code validation. of course things can't be broken I'm just saying don't obsess over code validation )

    overall I'm on the same page with you... Too many people send the unknowing people or new people chasing around a lot of crap factors. Most of them were at one time true but have like many other factors lost value over time.

    Good post

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Alicia For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    rain22's Avatar
    rain22 is offline IM & SEO Chatty rain22 has a spectacular aura about rain22 has a spectacular aura about
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,601
    Thanks Given
    38
    Thanked 148 Times in 112 Posts
    to validate the site's code takes only less than 1 minute, I think everyone has 1 minute to spend for their website.

  7. #6
    Alicia is offline IM & SEO Whisperer Alicia is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    29
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rain22 View Post
    to validate the site's code takes only less than 1 minute, I think everyone has 1 minute to spend for their website.
    yeah but when you're dealing with a domain that has over 250,000 pages ...it's not quite so convenient.

    But with the domain that size it is probably being produced by a CMS that is producing proper HTML.

    one thing that annoys me is that they keep coming out with new so-called STANDARDS for HTML coding. The original HTML coding is a lot more efficient than some of the progressions I've seen over the years.

    For example <strong> VS <b> ..... B for bold preceded strong and they both do the same exact thing. except that strong uses 8 characters while B uses only three. Multiply that out many times on a page and you're just creating increased page size and less efficiency to eschew the same results.

    Another thing that got on my nerves was when they started adding / too close single part tags opposed to tags that required a closing tag. Now we see

    <img src="" />
    <br /> instead of the old <br>. that's two more extra characters.

    It may seem like nothing but it's absolutely absurd to be getting less efficient over time were supposed to be getting more efficient. the argument was that they were trying to make clear and standard coding for content versus layout. And if you want to really get into it the whole move to design without any tables was a huge waste of time.

    When I'm surfing for my own stuff... I often see websites that cannot handle dynamic width... You see pieces of the page out of alignment whereas tables are extremely reliable and never fail like that. I think people embraced the CSS positioning because it is easier to master than tables. Overall tables are less efficient code wise but more reliable especially when you're dealing with dynamic width.
    Last edited by Alicia; 04-27-2011 at 08:18 AM.

  8. #7
    wink0r's Avatar
    wink0r is offline Moderator wink0r is a splendid one to behold wink0r is a splendid one to behold wink0r is a splendid one to behold wink0r is a splendid one to behold wink0r is a splendid one to behold wink0r is a splendid one to behold wink0r is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    East Coast, USA
    Posts
    2,183
    Thanks Given
    941
    Thanked 651 Times in 491 Posts
    For me, tables were completely logical while div based layout was illogical until I learned the rules. When I first dabbled in div based layouts I had a folder full of broken pages. Tables do present usability problems for those using screen readers and other alternative browsers.

    I design with fixed width and always center the content in the window. I don't like to visit sites with the content slammed against the left of the screen. At a minimum I recommend specifying a max width to avoid excessively long lines. Lines with more than 12 - 15 words are harder for the eye to follow. I do agree that full variable width sites can look pretty silly on a smaller than average screen.

    <br /> instead of the old <br>.
    The tags with a closing / are a feature of XHTML coding. Standard HTML 4.01 uses the <br> tag, and to the best of my knowledge HTML 5.0 does not change that. Most CMSs are coded in XHTML.

    I seldom run pages through the validator. Usually, in my experience, when a page produced in my editor does not validate it is because of some script or code snippet used on the page over which I have no control.

  9. #8
    yasmina is offline IM & SEO Quiet One yasmina is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    To get a high search engine ranking for your site you need to ensure that you consider all the key on page SEO factors and try to make them as search engine friendly as possible. Whilst good on page SEO does not automatically result in a high ranking it does help facilitate this.

  10. #9
    qzoners's Avatar
    qzoners is offline IM & SEO Whisperer qzoners is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    45
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
    How about the images with alt attribute in article. I thinks it can bee good for SEO too

  11. #10
    bluearrow's Avatar
    bluearrow is offline IM & SEO Chatty bluearrow is just really nice bluearrow is just really nice bluearrow is just really nice bluearrow is just really nice
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Mount Olympus
    Posts
    1,916
    Thanks Given
    118
    Thanked 356 Times in 262 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by qzoners View Post
    How about the images with alt attribute in article. I thinks it can bee good for SEO too
    Yes it's very good. If you have images then you must use Alt tag to get more seo benefits. I get considerable amount of traffic from Google image search !

  12. #11
    Riba's Avatar
    Riba is offline IM & SEO Weak Jaw Riba is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    111
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 33 Times in 21 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Alicia View Post
    one thing that annoys me is that they keep coming out with new so-called STANDARDS for HTML coding. The original HTML coding is a lot more efficient than some of the progressions I've seen over the years.

    For example <strong> VS <b> ..... B for bold preceded strong and they both do the same exact thing. except that strong uses 8 characters while B uses only three. Multiply that out many times on a page and you're just creating increased page size and less efficiency to eschew the same results.
    I wouldn't agree. <strong> and <b> are actually very different. Not to reinvent the wheel, here is a c&p from another place:

    <b> is a style - we know what "bold" is supposed to look like.

    <strong> however is an indication of how something should be understood. "Strong" could (and often does) mean "bold" in a browser, but it could also mean a lower tone for a speaking program like Jaws (for blind people). And strong on a Palm Pilot may be an underline (since you can't bold a bold).

    HTML was never meant to be about styles. Do some searches for "Tim Berners-Lee" and "the semantic web". <strong> is semantic - it describes the text it surrounds ("this text should be stronger than the rest of the text you've displayed") as opposed to describing how the text it surrounds should be displayed ("this text should be bold").

    Another thing that got on my nerves was when they started adding / too close single part tags opposed to tags that required a closing tag. Now we see

    <img src="" />
    <br /> instead of the old <br>. that's two more extra characters.

    It may seem like nothing but it's absolutely absurd to be getting less efficient over time were supposed to be getting more efficient. the argument was that they were trying to make clear and standard coding for content versus layout. And if you want to really get into it the whole move to design without any tables was a huge waste of time.
    Since you should have gzip compression turned on on your web server anyway, this argument is irrelevant.

    When I'm surfing for my own stuff... I often see websites that cannot handle dynamic width... You see pieces of the page out of alignment whereas tables are extremely reliable and never fail like that. I think people embraced the CSS positioning because it is easier to master than tables. Overall tables are less efficient code wise but more reliable especially when you're dealing with dynamic width.
    Now you are contradicting yourself. CSS is also reliable if used properly. Sometimes it is not used properly, probably because it is not as easy to master as tables are (or "were" actually).

    A lot has been said about the problem with the table based layouts, including what wink0r said below.

  13. #12
    fredsmith is offline Banned fredsmith has a spectacular aura about fredsmith has a spectacular aura about
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    raleigh nc
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks Given
    28
    Thanked 145 Times in 60 Posts
    I see that these are all good except you forgot h1 tags which are very important.

  14. #13
    mikaelcen's Avatar
    mikaelcen is offline IM & SEO Whisperer mikaelcen is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    25
    Thanks Given
    26
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    wow I got bump an old thread, hope I don't make a mistake.
    Here's a little question,
    1. how is important for validate site code
    2. about alt image tag, can I use the Same word for Title image tag and Alt tag and also image caption

  15. #14
    redchillimedia's Avatar
    redchillimedia is offline IM & SEO Weak Jaw redchillimedia is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    105
    Thanks Given
    3
    Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
    The Main On Page SEO Process are given below:
    1. Keyword Analysis
    2. Create Meta tags and title tags
    3. Content Optimization
    4. H1,H2,H3 Tags are using in body content
    5. Sitemap.xml creation
    6. Robot.txt file creation
    7. Canonical issue problem solve.

  16. #15
    jhonmike is offline IM & SEO Whisperer jhonmike is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    32
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
    On Page Optimization

    . Website analysis
    . Keyword Research, searching, competition
    . Content optimization
    . Alt tags
    . Meta description and meta keywords
    . Html tags
    . Robot text file
    . sitemaps


    .

  17. #16
    sarahania is offline IM & SEO Quiet One sarahania is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    15
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    now a days H tags are also playing vital roles. if you have your keywords in H tags the scope for rankings also increasing

  18. #17
    prime_mover is offline IM & SEO Whisperer prime_mover is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    63
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts
    "Yoast" is a helpful plugin along with "easy WP SEO" and you will be sure not to over look these good suggestions.

  19. #18
    bencurnow's Avatar
    bencurnow is offline IM & SEO Small Talker bencurnow has a spectacular aura about bencurnow has a spectacular aura about
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    561
    Thanks Given
    120
    Thanked 137 Times in 119 Posts
    Thanks for the advice Rain Im sure it will help a lot of people out

    Ben

  20. #19
    shrutirathore is offline IM & SEO Quiet One shrutirathore is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I think that robots.txt and sitemap are essential part of off page seo....

    ---------- Post added 09-17-2012 at 12:56 PM ----------

    Keyword stuffing is like how many times you are using your keyword.

  21. #20
    rogersmasters is offline IM & SEO Whisperer rogersmasters is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    49
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
    Different points every body but Main point rank well our sitte. Do these thinks which dont harm our site.


 

Similar Threads

  1. New keyword, existing page or new page better
    By paneli in forum Keyword Research and Niche Planning
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-03-2014, 06:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts