Welcome to the IMTalk - Internet Marketing & SEO Forum.
  • Login:
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 34 of 34
  1. #21
    eldi's Avatar
    eldi is offline IM & SEO Whisperer eldi is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    middle of nowhere
    Posts
    33
    Thanks Given
    16
    Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
    well for all my keywords is the same.

    only for 1 its going down.


    i will investigate a few days to find out why..as allot of stuff was used for this keyword.
    Been there, done that...

  2. #22
    seobunny Guest
    At Mattcutts Blog there is one person talking about that there are a few spammy sites still ranking on top...

    Matt Cutts says:

    Seppo, we have some things coming later this summer that should help with the type of sites you mention, so I think you made the right choice to work on building authority.
    Source: Penguin 2.0 rolled out today

    ---------- Post added 05-23-2013 at 04:08 PM ----------

    Tim Grice says something very interessting.. I think you people have to know this:

    Many sites were expecting to see link removal efforts when Penguin reran, however it is becoming clear that Penguin is not a penalty. There will be no magic recovery because you have removed links, this is an algorithm update, it isn’t Google saying ‘you’ve been naughty, we’re going to punish you’, this is Google saying ‘all that stuff you did to rank, we’ve just killed it, start again’. So unless you have managed to replace all the authority your low quality links were giving you, don’t expect to see your rankings come back.
    Source: Early thoughts on Penguin 2.0 | Branded3

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to seobunny For This Useful Post:


  4. #23
    Nemanja's Avatar
    Nemanja is offline IMTalk.org Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    www
    Posts
    4,870
    Thanks Given
    703
    Thanked 3,044 Times in 1,247 Posts
    Yes, well said by Tim.
    People just be smart in doing SEO and you don't need to worry about any new updates.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Nemanja For This Useful Post:


  6. #24
    imelbisnis is offline IM & SEO Mumbler imelbisnis is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    366
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 32 Times in 29 Posts
    OMG, the SERP of some my site is down. I hope this is just a google dance.

    But some website SERP is rank up to page 1.

  7. #25
    seobunny Guest
    Matt Cutts has tweet out that website operators should also participate in the evaluation of the second Penguin updates and can give a "Penguin Spam Report" feedback!

    In case you missed it, we're taking Penguin spam reports at http://bit.ly/penguinspamreport… and digging into the feedback we get.
    Here's a special spam report form: http://bit.ly/penguinspamreport… Please tell us about the spammy sites that Penguin missed.
    Source: https://twitter.com/mattcutts/

    If you see a spam site that is still ranking after the latest Penguin webspam algorithm, please tell us more about it.
    You can make your penguin spam report here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1rhR...viewform?pli=1

  8. #26
    Strlunga's Avatar
    Strlunga is offline IM & SEO Whisperer Strlunga is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    41
    Thanks Given
    16
    Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Have you already noticed any changes for webpages that were pushed with IMT Supercharged bookmarks? Is it still recommended to use them?

  9. #27
    seobunny Guest
    I found interessting stuff...

    Somebody is spamming to matt cutts in a funny way...




    then you can find in the link below a conversation with this guy and matt cutts about the penality in a forum.

    Link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5426209

    ---------- Post added 05-24-2013 at 08:03 AM ----------

    Dear Strlunga

    You can still using IMT Tools and everything is fine!
    And yes.. I recommend you to use these IMT Tools...

    EVERYTHING IS SAFED!

    Here is the proof, please read the post on this Thread: http://www.imtalk.org/f42/1589-imt-s...-sales-48.html

    Quote Originally Posted by Strlunga View Post
    Have you already noticed any changes for webpages that were pushed with IMT Supercharged bookmarks? Is it still recommended to use them?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to seobunny For This Useful Post:


  11. #28
    Strlunga's Avatar
    Strlunga is offline IM & SEO Whisperer Strlunga is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    41
    Thanks Given
    16
    Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Thank you seobunny! I am currently trying IMT Bookmarks for the first time. And I was afraid that this is the wrong time to use them... I'm curious on the effect.

  12. #29
    seobunny Guest
    LoL... My blog becomes PageRank 3... I dont know when.. but its new for me.

    4 Years ago my domain gets a PageRank penality because of spamtechniques. But it seems fine now after all these updates... after 4 years lol.

  13. #30
    seobunny Guest
    I found a Case Study about the looser domains from penguin 2.0 update.
    Its very interessting and a very long case study.

    YOU PEOPLE HAVE TO SPEND TIME AND READ IT ALL!!!
    Link: Deep Dive into a Penguin 2.0 Victim - Penalty Analysis and lot's of spammy links - LRT Link Research Tools LRT Link Research Tools

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to seobunny For This Useful Post:


  15. #31
    AaronLuke's Avatar
    AaronLuke is offline IM & SEO Weak Jaw AaronLuke will become famous soon enough AaronLuke will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    140
    Thanks Given
    22
    Thanked 114 Times in 33 Posts
    My site was some what penalized(around 30%-40% traffic loss) by the first Penguin update but it looks like after some update that happened at the beginning of May recently and Penguin 2.0 my site was effected in a good way. It didn't get all the keywords back that it lost pre Penguin 1.0, but after Penguin 2.0 it got a new keyword and some of the old keywords it lost are now either close to the first page or close to the top 100. Looks like it isn't penalized for those specific keywords anymore.

    I haven't done link building in nearly over a year. I did some link building post Penguin 1.0 just to try and make my site's link profile look less artificial by using the url, branded keyword and generic keyword anchor text, but not much happened after that. Other than that I just worked on improving the actual site and got a bunch of facebook likes/google pluses/addthis shares naturally.

    Fortunately I didn't have to look for my links and request that they get deleted like I've heard a lot of other people did since the majority of the links I manually built Pre Penguin 1.0 were naturally deleted since they were either part of a network that got deindexed or part of a .edu blog or forum that the site quickly found out about post Penguin 1.0 and deleted themselves.

    Another thing I noticed with my site after Penguin 1.0, when I google'd the description of my site it would show up on the second page. A few scrapers and web statistic sites were above it. Other sites had more authority over my own description than I did/where it originally came from. But finally after Penguin 2.0 my site is number 1 when I google the description like it should be. That gives me the impression that even though the link profile of my site or anyone else's site that was penalized may have been fixed and in good if not perfect condition for a long time but that wouldn't have mattered since they'd have to wait for a big update like Penguin 2.0 to happen before Google acknowledges that.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AaronLuke For This Useful Post:


  17. #32
    madxpo is offline IM & SEO Quiet One madxpo is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    19
    Thanks Given
    7
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
    Saw some of my sites hit by Penguin 2.0, not drastically but I did notice that there is less occurrence of the same site in the top 100. Previously I had a few pages from one site listed in the top 100 listing now only the highest ranked page seems to be on. Also, the bookmarks I did here was actually listed but way back in page 10. Maybe still doing the dance.

  18. #33
    seobunny Guest
    There are tons of bot scraping and stealing your content!!! I really know your problem but there is a easy way to solve this!

    You have to disallow a lot of bots by adding some lines in your robots.txt file.

    Add these lines to your robots.txt file:

    Code:
    User-agent: Alexibot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Aqua_Products
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: asterias
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: b2w/0.1
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: BackDoorBot/1.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: BlowFish/1.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Bookmark search tool
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: BotALot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: BotRightHere
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: BuiltBotTough
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Bullseye/1.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: BunnySlippers
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: CheeseBot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: CherryPicker
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: CherryPickerElite/1.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: CherryPickerSE/1.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Copernic
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: CopyRightCheck
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: cosmos
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Crescent Internet ToolPak HTTP OLE Control v.1.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Crescent
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: DittoSpyder
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: EmailCollector
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: EmailSiphon
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: EmailWolf
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: EroCrawler
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: ExtractorPro
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: FairAd Client
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Flaming AttackBot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Foobot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Gaisbot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: GetRight/4.2
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Harvest/1.5
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: hloader
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: httplib
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: HTTrack 3.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: humanlinks
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: InfoNaviRobot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Iron33/1.0.2
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: JennyBot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Kenjin Spider
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Keyword Density/0.9
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: larbin
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: LexiBot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: libWeb/clsHTTP
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: LinkextractorPro
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: LinkScan/8.1a Unix
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: LinkWalker
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: LNSpiderguy
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: lwp-trivial/1.34
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: lwp-trivial
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Mata Hari
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Microsoft URL Control - 5.01.4511
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Microsoft URL Control - 6.00.8169
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Microsoft URL Control
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: MIIxpc/4.2
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: MIIxpc
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Mister PiX
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: moget/2.1
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: moget
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; BullsEye; Windows 95)
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: MSIECrawler
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: NetAnts
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: NICErsPRO
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Offline Explorer
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Openbot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Openfind data gatherer
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Openfind
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Oracle Ultra Search
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: PerMan
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: ProPowerBot/2.14
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: ProWebWalker
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: psbot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Python-urllib
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: QueryN Metasearch
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Radiation Retriever 1.1
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: RepoMonkey Bait & Tackle/v1.01
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: RepoMonkey
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: RMA
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: searchpreview
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: SiteSnagger
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: SpankBot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: spanner
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: suzuran
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Szukacz/1.4
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Teleport
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: TeleportPro
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Telesoft
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: The Intraformant
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: TheNomad
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: TightTwatBot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: toCrawl/UrlDispatcher
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: True_Robot/1.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: True_Robot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: turingos
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: TurnitinBot/1.5
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: TurnitinBot
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: URL Control
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: URL_Spider_Pro
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: URLy Warning
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: VCI WebViewer VCI WebViewer Win32
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: VCI
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Web Image Collector
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebAuto
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebBandit/3.50
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebBandit
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebCapture 2.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebCopier v.2.2
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebCopier v3.2a
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebCopier
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebEnhancer
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebSauger
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Website Quester
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Webster Pro
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebStripper
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebZip/4.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebZIP/4.21
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebZIP/5.0
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WebZip
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Wget/1.5.3
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Wget/1.6
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Wget
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: wget
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: WWW-Collector-E
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Xenu's Link Sleuth 1.1c
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Xenu's
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Zeus 32297 Webster Pro V2.9 Win32
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Zeus Link Scout
    Disallow: /
    
    User-agent: Zeus
    Disallow: /
    Quote Originally Posted by AaronLuke View Post
    My site was some what penalized(around 30%-40% traffic loss) by the first Penguin update but it looks like after some update that happened at the beginning of May recently and Penguin 2.0 my site was effected in a good way. It didn't get all the keywords back that it lost pre Penguin 1.0, but after Penguin 2.0 it got a new keyword and some of the old keywords it lost are now either close to the first page or close to the top 100. Looks like it isn't penalized for those specific keywords anymore.

    I haven't done link building in nearly over a year. I did some link building post Penguin 1.0 just to try and make my site's link profile look less artificial by using the url, branded keyword and generic keyword anchor text, but not much happened after that. Other than that I just worked on improving the actual site and got a bunch of facebook likes/google pluses/addthis shares naturally.

    Fortunately I didn't have to look for my links and request that they get deleted like I've heard a lot of other people did since the majority of the links I manually built Pre Penguin 1.0 were naturally deleted since they were either part of a network that got deindexed or part of a .edu blog or forum that the site quickly found out about post Penguin 1.0 and deleted themselves.

    Another thing I noticed with my site after Penguin 1.0, when I google'd the description of my site it would show up on the second page. A few scrapers and web statistic sites were above it. Other sites had more authority over my own description than I did/where it originally came from. But finally after Penguin 2.0 my site is number 1 when I google the description like it should be. That gives me the impression that even though the link profile of my site or anyone else's site that was penalized may have been fixed and in good if not perfect condition for a long time but that wouldn't have mattered since they'd have to wait for a big update like Penguin 2.0 to happen before Google acknowledges that.

  19. #34
    Nemanja's Avatar
    Nemanja is offline IMTalk.org Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute Nemanja has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    www
    Posts
    4,870
    Thanks Given
    703
    Thanked 3,044 Times in 1,247 Posts
    Unfortunately solution with robots.txt won't help much, I already explained this few years ago:

    There are few ways you can block them, like with robots.txt(yeah right ), some custom made scripts and htaccess file.
    Problem with robots.txt is that bad boots don't obey and follow what is in it,
    only good bots obey robots.txt and we don't have problems with good bots like googlebot, bingbot, slurp, ...in the first place.
    So robots.txt is just a reference to the spiders which they "might" follow.

    So next logical solution would be .htaccess file, because it is very easy to implement and configure one.
    If you don't have one in your root dir of your server just create one naming it ".htaccess", it is that easy


    http://www.imtalk.org/f19/5191-bad-b...tion-here.html

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Nemanja For This Useful Post:



 

Similar Threads

  1. Last Google Penguin Update & Recovery Info
    By asghar in forum Google
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-10-2012, 02:34 PM
  2. market samurai video and tools on penguin update
    By vf8170 in forum General SEO Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-22-2012, 07:01 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-10-2012, 01:04 PM
  4. PR update is Coming, Are You ready?
    By hetalhet in forum Google
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-16-2010, 08:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts