I don't think that after Google's Panda Update Article Spam still works .
I don't think that after Google's Panda Update Article Spam still works .
Article/Content Marketing will always work although competition is increasing day by day and the way will be changing with the passage of time.
It's always going to be effective.
Just ensure that you have chosen a niche where you can write as an authority.
i think for marketing, theres keyword reasearch skill behind that.
but for backlink( ezine) I think the backlink is strong enough
I think its of no use submitting same article to different article directories. Writing unique article on same topic can only be helpful.
ADSENSE MAXIMIZER - increase your adsense income by 146% in 5 minutes!
I think a lot depends on Google's perception of the authority of the sites where the content is posted. This may be why Press Releases do so well - all of the sites on which the content appears are considered more of an authority site than, say, marketing blogs or lesser-known article directories. Of course, the vast majority of online press release sites are really nothing more than big blogs anyway. Still, they do have lots of ever changing, highly relevant content and are very active, which Google likes to see.
Some subscribe to "chaos theory" - in other words the content surrounding the posted content also has a bearing. Again this may be the case with Press Release sites - the entire page is never the same. In this theory you can post content that is exactly because when you look at the entire page it is different. In one system I use this appears to work.
Most discussions I have seen elsewhere suggest that you submit original content to the major article directories, such as Ezine Articles and ArticleBase, and then spin that to submit to other article directories primarily for backlinks. There are tools like SeNukeX and Magic Submitter that make this process easy.
I saw recently a blog post from Jonathan Leger where he did a case study of promoting 2 versions of the same website content, one using links from duplicate content, and one using links from unique (spun content). The unique content blog appeared faster in the search results and stayed there longer.
can you give the link to that case study. i wanna read it, sound interesting to me, and about duplicate content, no doubt about it because i see some duplicate content can rank well in search engine, but it depend on many factors and also the topic of the content as well.. for example if your website is new (i mean really new maybe just 2 3 days already made), and other website which is 5 years old and also have more authority posted or copied your content, that authority website can rank higher than your new fresh website..Originally Posted by billbrine;47964
I saw recently a[B
Addicted to IM
ADSENSE MAXIMIZER - increase your adsense income by 146% in 5 minutes!
You are right, older websites are ranked higher by Google and apparently are considered to have more authority. There is also some evidence that Google will not rank your site so highly if it discovers what it thinks are affiliate links on the site, which is why some IMers advise cloaking any affiliate links.
The advice I have seen says to cloak affiliate links anywhere that they appear on the page, whether it be in the content or on the sidebar, header or footer.
The case study says that the site having backlinks from unique content ranked faster and higher than the site having backlinks from duplicate content.
Both sites in the case study now look like they have been de-indexed, as neither shows up anywhere in google for the target keyword phrase.
ADSENSE MAXIMIZER - increase your adsense income by 146% in 5 minutes!